Cython is a Python compiler. This means that it can compile normal Python code without changes (with a few obvious exceptions of some as-yet unsupported language features, see Cython limitations ). However, for performance critical code, it is often helpful to add static type declarations, as they will allow Cython to step out of the dynamic nature of the Python code and generate simpler and faster C code - sometimes faster by orders of magnitude.
It must be noted, however, that type declarations can make the source code more verbose and thus less readable. It is therefore discouraged to use them without good reason, such as where benchmarks prove that they really make the code substantially faster in a performance critical section. Typically a few types in the right spots go a long way.
All C types are available for type declarations: integer and floating
point types, complex numbers, structs, unions and pointer types.
Cython can automatically and correctly convert between the types on
assignment. This also includes Python’s arbitrary size integer types,
where value overflows on conversion to a C type will raise a Python
at runtime. (It does not, however, check for overflow
when doing arithmetic.) The generated C code will handle the
platform dependent sizes of C types correctly and safely in this case.
Types are declared via the cdef keyword.
Consider the following pure Python code:
def f(x): return x ** 2 - x def integrate_f(a, b, N): s = 0 dx = (b - a) / N for i in range(N): s += f(a + i * dx) return s * dx
Simply compiling this in Cython merely gives a 35% speedup. This is better than nothing, but adding some static types can make a much larger difference.
With additional type declarations, this might look like:
def f(double x): return x ** 2 - x def integrate_f(double a, double b, int N): cdef int i cdef double s, dx s = 0 dx = (b - a) / N for i in range(N): s += f(a + i * dx) return s * dx
Since the iterator variable
is typed with C semantics, the for-loop will be compiled
to pure C code. Typing
is important as they are involved
in arithmetic within the for-loop; typing
makes less of a
difference, but in this case it is not much extra work to be
consistent and type the entire function.
This results in a 4 times speedup over the pure Python version.
Python function calls can be expensive – in Cython doubly so because
one might need to convert to and from Python objects to do the call.
In our example above, the argument is assumed to be a C double both inside f()
and in the call to it, yet a Python
object must be constructed around the
argument in order to pass it.
Therefore Cython provides a syntax for declaring a C-style function, the cdef keyword:
cdef double f(double x) except? -2: return x ** 2 - x
Some form of except-modifier should usually be added, otherwise Cython
will not be able to propagate exceptions raised in the function (or a
function it calls). The
means that an error will be checked
is returned (though the
be used as a valid return value).
Alternatively, the slower
safe. An except clause can be left out if the function returns a Python
object or if it is guaranteed that an exception will not be raised
within the function call.
A side-effect of cdef is that the function is no longer available from
Python-space, as Python wouldn’t know how to call it. It is also no
longer possible to change
keyword instead of
, a Python wrapper is also
created, so that the function is available both from Cython (fast, passing
typed values directly) and from Python (wrapping values in Python
objects). In fact,
does not just provide a Python wrapper, it also
installs logic to allow the method to be overridden by python methods, even
when called from within cython. This does add a tiny overhead compared to
Speedup: 150 times over pure Python.
Because static typing is often the key to large speed gains, beginners often have a tendency to type everything in sight. This cuts down on both readability and flexibility, and can even slow things down (e.g. by adding unnecessary type checks, conversions, or slow buffer unpacking). On the other hand, it is easy to kill performance by forgetting to type a critical loop variable. Two essential tools to help with this task are profiling and annotation. Profiling should be the first step of any optimization effort, and can tell you where you are spending your time. Cython’s annotation can then tell you why your code is taking time.
switch to the
command line program (or
following a link from the Sage notebook) results in an HTML report
of Cython code interleaved with the generated C code. Lines are
colored according to the level of “typedness” –
white lines translate to pure C,
while lines that require the Python C-API are yellow
(darker as they translate to more C-API interaction).
Lines that translate to C code have a plus (
) in front
and can be clicked to show the generated code.
This report is invaluable when optimizing a function for speed,
and for determining when to
release the GIL
in general, a
block may contain only “white” code.
Note that Cython deduces the type of local variables based on their assignments
(including as loop variable targets) which can also cut down on the need to
explicitly specify types everywhere.
For example, declaring
to be of type double above is unnecessary,
as is declaring the type of
in the last version (where the return type
is known to be a C double.) A notable exception, however, is
integer types used in arithmetic expressions
, as Cython is unable to ensure
that an overflow would not occur (and so falls back to
Python’s bignums are needed). To allow inference of C integer types, set the
. This directive
does a work similar to the
keyword in C++ for the readers who are familiar
with this language feature. It can be of great help to cut down on the need to type
everything, but it also can lead to surprises. Especially if one isn’t familiar with
arithmetic expressions with c types. A quick overview of those
can be found